I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
最重要的是，这套打法能迅速占领用户心智，从精神产品到拿到手的商品，全面占领。
，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
Что думаешь? Оцени!，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
前苹果首席设计师乔纳森 · 艾维：创造美的事物